All rights have
responsibilities. I have a right to free speech, but I have to keep
that speech within the laws of libel and away from sedition and
treason. I have the right to assemble, but not to assemble to commit
a crime. And I have a right to own a gun, but not to overstep the
boundaries of the society I live in.
Let me start by stating that
I am both for and against gun control. Having almost been a victim
of a crime involving a gun as well as having a gun pointed at me, I
don't like cheap handguns or uncontrolled purchasing of a gun. But I
have enjoyed shooting sports and love to target shoot. I am not a
hunter but understand the need for hunting even if I don't see the
fun in it.
The majority of gun owners
that I know are sane, rational people who enjoy hunting, trap
shooting, target or plinking. They might have a gun for personal or
property protection. I see gun owners as one or more of the
following:
1) Hunters, target
shooters, plinkers, skeet - probably 90% of all gun owners. Most
of these people are careful, respectful, safety minded people who
enjoy what they do.
2) Collectors – they might be
hunters and shooters as well, but represent another percentage.
Usually collectors are interested in different types of guns.
3) Farm/Rural – protection from
varmints and such. Not so much home protection (which they can be
aware of) but more to protect their animals.
4) Home protection - Worried about
someone breaking into their home
5) Personal Protection – This would
include both the George Zimmerman's of the world (wanna be heroes)
as well as people who might have to be in harms way such as late at
night workers and women.
6) Criminals – need cheap,
untraceable access to weapons.
7) survivalist/anti-government –
Unfounded concern that the government will take their
guns/rights/beliefs away.
The first five categories to me are the
second amendment. And I strongly believe most of these gun owners are
responsible people. They have gun locks and safes. They know how to
keep children away from a hand gun for protection and know how to use
their weapon safely. The personal protection issue is one that still
bothers me, but in a discussion with a woman who had to be in a
relatively bad neighborhood or just one that might be in the wrong
place at the wrong time, some sort of personal protection seems
reasonable. I reference George Zimmerman because I think of him as
the poster child of the wanna-be hero. I do wonder about all those
concealed carries where the gun owner is hoping someone will do
something so they can take him out just like in the movies.
A criminal is obviously someone who
shouldn't get access to any gun. However, in the uncontrolled world of guns, a criminal can get a gun pretty quickly and pretty cheap. And yet, people are more concerned about a government getting their guns than a criminal buying a gun for a hundred dollars. Frankly, I would rather get the guns out the criminals hands than out of responsible people's hands. Survivalists and anti-government people scare me
because they do not believe in the country I live in and believe they
are above or outside of laws that they feel don't apply to them. These people are no better than the criminals.
However, since most gun owners should
be responsible owners, there are a few who do not. And
unfortunately, guns have to regulated because of these irresponsible
people.
I have a number of proposals that I
think will help not be a burden to the responsible gun owners and
will attempt to keep guns away from the criminal and the
irresponsible.
However, gun ownership has a
responsibility associated with it. And if a gun owner can not be
responsible, then they can loose the right to have guns around them.
The second amendment does not say everyone should be armed. On the
other hand, I do not believe in restricting any gun. There are
collectors that have or want to have an Uzi or AK-47 for their
collections and to fire. I don't have a problem with that. As long
as the owner has the necessary controls.
Related to Gun Ownership
- Establish a national database of all firearms and magazines . There would be an electronic update from the gun shop/gun owner that would tie into the local police organizations as well as a national database.
- Register all weapons, larger capacity magazines. There would be no gun show, private sale without notification to the national database. No one is interested in taking guns away from law-abiding, responsible gun owners, but , if you are irresponsible with the control of those guns, then those guns should be taken away since you are likely to hurt someone.
- A 7 day waiting on all guns (except to dealers) and if the user doesn't want to wait, the police should be notified and a visit made to ask why. Even in a private sale or a gun show, a dealer would have to be involved to 'manage' the sale or trade.
- You can only purchase a small number of weapons at one time. If you wish to purchase a number of guns (such as a gun range or purchasing a collection of guns), you need to prove why.
- Mandatory reporting in near real time of weapons purchases to the local police who need to correlate these reports to see if anyone is purchasing many weapons.
- No purchases with cash without permission from local police.
- Mandatory trigger locks on all guns. You buy a gun, you buy a lock.
- Liability insurance mandatory on all weapons
- Mandatory immediate reporting of stolen weapons or ammo.
- Microstamping of all guns and it would be illegal to remove or replace this microstamp without notification.
- You must be a citizen of the US to purchase a gun in the US.
Mental Illness
- If a person with mental health issues is released to the public, part of the evaluation has to be whether or not guns can be in the home or not. If the person is not see as not fit to be near guns, all guns must be removed from the home and area.
- If the person moves, the authorities should follow up to make sure there are no guns in that home as well.
- A black list should be maintained as to who may never buy a gun. Only via the courts can a name be removed.
- The police, courts or a psychologist can request that no guns should be in the home through a court order.
- The guns should be removed and stored in a recommended place, such as the police station, gun shop or range. Access to the guns has to be controlled.
- The national data base will have access to people who can not have access to weapons for purchase etc.
Penalties for unsafe or illegal
practices
- Gun ownership is a right, but unsafe or illegal practices can have that right restricted.
- Having weapons in a house that are not properly secured.
- Allowing weapons in a house when the courts have viewed it unsafe
- Selling guns without proper procedures
- Dealers selling large number of guns unchecked or accepting cash without police verification can loose the right to have guns on the premises and to have guns in their homes of all the employees.

